Vol.63 No.6 November 2015
A multicenter retrospective analysis regarding the clinical safety and efficacy of the post-approval meropenem dose in Japanese patients
1)Department of Infection Control and Prevention and Pharmacy, Aichi Medical University Hospital School of Medicine, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
2)Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
3)Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital
4)Department of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital
5)Department of Pharmacy, Gifu Municipal Hospital
6)Department of Pharmacy, Takayama Red Cross Hospital
7)Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Anjo Kosei Hospital
8)Division of Pharmacy, Suzuka Kaisei Hospital
9)Department of Pharmacy, Tokai Municipal Hospital
10)Department of Pharmacy, and Infection Control and Prevention, Nagoya City University Hospital
11)Department of Pharmacy, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center
12)Department of Pharmacy, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital
13)Department of Pharmacy, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
14)Department of Pharmacy, Ogaki Municipal Hospital
15)Department of Pharmacy, Shizuoka Cancer Center
16)Department of Pharmacy, JA Mie Suzuka General Hospital
17)Department of Pharmacy, Japan Community Health Care Organization Yokkaichi Hazu Medical Center
18)Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Aichi Medical University Hospital School of Medicine
19)Department of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University Graduate School of Medicine
20)Tokai Regional Infection Control Study Group (TRICSG)
Abstract
The post-approval dose of meropenem (MEPM), namely ≥3 g daily, is widely used for severe or refractory infectious diseases in Japan. However, evidence for the safety and efficacy of the post-approval dose in MEPM therapy remains insufficient. In a multicenter retrospective analysis, we compared patient backgrounds and the safety and efficacy of high-dose MEPM therapy with those patients who received the pre-approval MEPM therapy dose for severe or refractory infectious diseases.
Our final study comprised 383 cases; 231 cases in which the post-approval dose of MEPM was given versus 152 cases of the pre-approval dose of less than 3 g daily. The safety rates were 12.1% and 9.9% (p=0.49) and the clinical efficacy rates were 87.0% and 75.0% (p<0.01), respectively. The most frequent adverse event was hepatopathy but overall, severe adverse effects were not observed.
These findings suggest that an MEPM dose larger than 3 g daily is a useful and tolerable therapy in Japanese infectious patients.
Key word
meropenem, safety, efficacy, multicenter retrospective analysis
Received
March 27, 2015
Accepted
July 14, 2015
Jpn. J. Chemother. 63 (6): 560-567, 2015