ページの先頭です
HOME > Past Issue List > Issue List > Abstract
言語を選択(Language)
日本語(Japanese)English

Abstract

Vol.53 No.2 February 2005

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by chemiluminescence ATP assay

Masaki Yoshida1,2), Kohya Shiba1,2) and Tatsuo Hosoya1)

1)Department of Internal Medicine and 2)Division of Infection Control
Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by chemiluminescence ATP assay is a new method for determining of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by the broth microdilution method. In this method bacterial ATP is measured by the luciferin-luciferase reaction. We tested 30 Staphylococcus aureus strains consisting of 15 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains, and 15 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains for susceptibility to 12 antimicrobial agents and 15 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains for susceptibility to 7 antimicrobial agents and compared the results to those obtained by the standard broth microdilution method. chemilumine-scence ATP assays were performed after incubating inoculated microdilution trays for 6 hr at 35°C.
In the result of the testing for MSSA, the rate of agreement between the results of the tests for ampicillin was only 60.0%. In addition to the result, the rate of agreement for ofloxacin was only 20.0%. The rates of agreement for MICs by the chemiluminescence ATP assay and standard broth microdilution method for MSSA was high for all antimicrobial agents except ampicillin and ofloxacin. The rate of agreement for MICs by the same two methods for MRSA was also high. On the other hand, the rate of agreement for MICs by the two methods for P. aeruginosa was low. The MIC determination method by the chemiluminescence ATP assay was more rapidly than the standard broth microdilution method. The chemiluminescence ATP assay may be the most sensitive testing when we choose the combination a sort of bacteria and antimicrobial agent.

Key word

chemiluminescent assay, ATP, Antibacterial activity

Received

December 13, 2004

Accepted

January 21, 2005

Jpn. J. Chemother. 53 (2): 128-133, 2005