ページの先頭です
HOME > Past Issue List > Issue List > Abstract
言語を選択(Language)
日本語(Japanese)English

Abstract

Vol.60 No.4 July 2012

Study on the penetration of sitafloxacin into the prostatic fluid

Sadao Kamidono1), Takashi Matsui1), Kazushi Tanaka2), Soichi Arakawa2) and Masato Fujisawa2)

1)Department of Urology, Kobe Red Cross Hospital, 1-3-1 Wakinohamakaigandori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
2)Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine

Abstract

To investigate the accumulation of sitafloxacin(STFX, Gracevit®) in the prostatic fluid, a single dose of STFX was orally administered to healthy adult males while fasting. We determined the STFX concentration in the serum and prostatic fluid at 1 and 2 hours after administration, and also calculated the ratio of the prostatic fluid STFX concentration to the serum STFX concentration at 1 and 2 hours. A dose of 50 mg was administered to 6 subjects and a dose of 100 mg was given to 6 subjects (total: 12 subjects).
The mean prostatic fluid STFX concentration (mean±SD) at 1 and 2 hours after administration was respectively 0.147±0.190 μg/mL and 0.147±0.126 μg/mL at a dose of 50 mg versus 0.163±0.188 μg/mL and 0.347±0.187 μg/mL at a dose of 100 mg. The mean prostatic fluid/serum STFX concentration ratio at 1 and 2 hours after administration was respectively 0.287±0.223 and 0.408±0.262 at a dose of 50 mg versus 0.394±0.212 and 0.506±0.181 at a dose of 100 mg.
Diarrhea occurred in one subject receiving a dose of 100 mg and a causal relationship between the diarrhea and STFX could not be ruled out. There were no abnormalities of vital signs or laboratory test results for which a causal relationship with STFX could not be ruled out.
The mean prostatic fluid/serum STFX concentration ratio ranged from 0.287 to 0.506. These results suggest that STFX is equivalent to other quinolone antibiotics.

Key word

sitafloxacin, quinolone, pharmacokinetics, prostatic fluid

Received

March 23, 2012

Accepted

May 1, 2012

Jpn. J. Chemother. 60 (4): 492-495, 2012